Tough love
Tough love can apply both in relationship to another adult or child, and also in relationship to one's self. Exercising tough love in a relationship requires some form of intentional dialogue. Exercising tough love with oneself requires self-reflection and meditation.
It comes up as an issue when someone else is out of control. However, this also applies to self out of control and ignoring the dictates of wisdom, such as acting against one's better judgment. How to tame your inner toddler.
We tend to believe what we want and so can be very attracted to things and to people we want. These wants become more believable and more urgent the more we want them. They become our truth for as long as we want.
Needs, wants, interests and motives
Often tough love is about letting go of wants that masquerade as needs, rather than hanging on to them. Being kind to oneself and loving of oneself sometimes means saying no to things we 'want' (and habitually think we need). This is achieved by first differentiating wants (limitless and can never be fully satisfied) from age appropriate survival needs (must haves to live a recognizably human life and can be satiated). Secondly, by setting and defending inner and outer boundaries that honor the difference.
Differentiating those needs, wants, interests and motives is an ethical and an economic challenge where perspectives are influenced by age, gender, class, culture and ethnicity. More on this below.
Rescuing or trying to fix it are usually less effective than a tough love approach. Tough love encourages the growth of a stress hardy or resilient self, one that has learned optimism.
Optimism does not equal positive thinking. Positive thinking does not significantly affect your life. Seligman would argue that it doesn't matter how many times you repeat a positive mantra to yourself. He identified three primary elements of our explanatory style: permanence, pervasiveness, and personalization. Our current tendencies (in use of these explanations) dictate our level of optimism. Siegelman
Tough love requires of oneself and the other both respect and dignity. Respect is an attitude of admiration or esteem, which circumvents reason and logic. Dignity is the quality of being worthy of that respect or esteem. More on respect in how to mend a relationship.
Tough love is formed of seven attributes: dignity, humility, correction, endurance, compassion, discipline (correction) and kindness. In Luria's kabbalah each of these is paired with the other (e.g. humility with discipline). All of those pairings together describe tough love, but the practice of it is in the guts. And it can be gut wrenching.
Wisdom
Sometimes it is useful to think of soul as a repository of inherent optimism or pre-existing wisdom. We notice this in kids born with a remarkable inner knowing or with a precocious gift. We find awareness of it growing in kids with terminal illness. In this sense, soul holds us in a tough love framework, one in which we choose what we actually need not what we think we want.
However, it is not useful to think of soul in a causative way when you face social injustice or genocide, for instance. People don't ask a runaway train to trash their lives nor a betraying spouse to turn their home into a place of treachery. Surviving the experience itself may grow wisdom but it is mad to believe our 'higher self' or 'karma' calls it down on us as if 'we had it coming'. Bad things happen to good people and good things happen to people who knowingly and repeatedly cause harm.
Here are some tough love reflections of a survivor of suicide.
Facing human rights violations requires tough love to handle the complex, moral dilemmas like those facing UN Peacekeepers.
A list of principles:
- Tough love is saying no when the yes would be much easier, but would make the person or oneself more dependant
- Tough love knows that help freely given can create dependency
- Tough love is non-manipulative and unconditional
- Tough love offers empathy, but not sympathy
- Tough love is non-supportive of victim stories
- Tough love offers support and courage, but not help
- Tough love encourages strength not weakness
- Tough love doesn't worry that you might make a mistake
- Tough love encourages free choice and the learning that comes from making mistakes
- Tough love opts for growth in consciousness
- Tough love says, “If you eat biscuits in bed you sleep with the crumbs.” Let the natural consequences flow.
- Tough love knows that you must learn how to lose before you can win
- Tough love knows that security is in letting go, not in hanging on
- Tough love demands responsible behaviour
- Tough love doesn't do for them what they can do for themselves
- Tough love expects civility, cooperation and courteous behaviour
- Tough love respects their rights and commands the respect of self and others. Source.
Navigation page for my pre-commitment Relationship Education study cycle
Simplified wants/needs diagram:
The human needs theory of conflict
'Interests, needs, and values are three concepts that underlie most conflicts, yet are often confused.... The term "interests" is generally used to refer to the things people want in a conflict. They are often, though not necessarily, material. They are generally negotiable - people are willing to trade more or less of one interest for more or less of another. Yet conflicts are often defined in terms of incompatible interests. It is assumed that there is only so much of something (money, land, jobs, etc.) and the more one person or group gets, the less the other side gets. Thus, framing conflicts in terms of interests often yields a "zero sum" or "win-lose" situation.
Needs, on the other hand, are also things people want in a conflict. However, they are usually not material things, but intangible things such as security, identity, and recognition. According to John Burton, one of the leading human needs theorists, they "reflect universal motivations. They are an integral part of the human being."
Needs differ from interests in several important ways. First, they are non-negotiable. People will not trade away their identity or their security. Identity and security are so fundamental, so necessary to all human satisfaction, that people will do almost anything, even things that violate fundamental norms, or diminish their ability to attain their interests, in an effort to obtain their fundamental needs. A second difference is that needs are usually not mutually exclusive.
Analytical problem solving is a social-psychological approach to dealing with deep-rooted, protracted intergroup and international conflicts. Initially developed by Herbert Kelman and John Burton, this technique is based on the human needs theory of conflict, which says that most deep-rooted conflicts are caused by one or more person's or group's inability to obtain its fundamental human needs - for instance, identity, security, or recognition.
By identifying the underlying needs that are lacking, parties are often able to redefine the conflict in a way that facilitates joint problem solving and collaboration, when such was impossible before. This is especially true when conflicts are defined in terms of mutually exclusive interests. Unlike interests, needs are usually mutually-reinforcing, rather than mutually exclusive. .. a great deal of emphasis is put on identifying and examining each parties' perspective on the problem, including the parties' values, interests, prejudices, hopes, fears, and needs.
As with transformative mediation, emotions are not avoided, but are dealt with directly. Much emphasis is put on mutual recognition of the needs of the other party and empowerment of the parties to approach their mutual problem in new ways.' More.
The most basic concept underlying marketing is that of human needs. Human needs are states of felt deprivation. They include basic physical needs for food, clothing, warmth and safety; social needs for belonging and affection; and individual needs for knowledge and self-expression. Marketers do not invent these needs; they are a basic part of the human make up.
Wants are the form taken by human needs as they are shaped by culture and individual personality. A hungry person in the United States might want a Big Mac, French Fries, and a Coke. A hungry person in Bali might want mangoes, suckling pig and beans. Wants are described in terms of objects that will satisfy needs.
People have almost unlimited wants but limited resources. Thus they want to choose products that provide the most value and satisfaction for their money. When backed by buying power, wants become demands. Consumers view products as bundles of benefits and choose products that give them the best bundle for their money. A Honda Civic means basic transportation, low price and fuel economy; a Lexus means comfort, luxury, and status. Given their wants and resources people demand product with the benefits that add up to the most satisfaction.
Disclaimer
Please note that the information in this web site is provided as a free service. Accessing this site does not create any form of legal or professional relationship and neither this web site, its host or its contributors accept any liability or responsibility for any action taken or avoided on the basis of information provided. It is dangerous to rely on generalized information or guidance. You should ALWAYS seek independent professional advice in order that it can be tailored to your own individual circumstances.
Inclusion of other sites on this site in no way implies endorsement by me of these sites or any services offered by these sites. These links are provided as a service only and as when purchasing any service or product, consumers should satisfy themselves as to the validity and credentials of those who offer a service. Terms & Conditions
